SPRATLIN, HARRINGTON & THOMAS v. HAWN

42773.

116 Ga. App. 175 (1967)

156 S.E.2d 402

SPRATLIN, HARRINGTON & THOMAS, INC. v. HAWN et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided June 20, 1967.

Rehearing Denied July 13, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Webb, Parker & Ferguson, John Tye Ferguson, for appellant.

Grant, Spears & Duckworth, William G. Grant, for appellees.


QUILLIAN, Judge.

The appellant's enumerations of error may be categorized into three basic contentions, which follow.

(1) There was no special plea raising the issue of "dual agency" as to Count 3. Since "dual agency" is an affirmative defense it must be plead. Thus, the only question relative to Count 3 is whether the allegations were proved. The appellant contends the allegations were supported by sufficient proof and therefore it is entitled to recover...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases