HUTCHINS v. DAY

No. 692.

153 S.E.2d 132 (1967)

269 N.C. 607

Louise G. HUTCHINS v. Russell V. DAY.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 8, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alston, Alexander, Pell & Pell, E. L. Alston, Jr., Greensboro, for plaintiff appellant.

Russell V. Day (in propria persona), for defendant appellee.


PLESS, Justice.

While an action for civil seduction may be maintained without a promise to marry, the mere proof of intercourse, and no more, is not sufficient to warrant recovery. Volenti non fit injuria. Hardin v. Davis, 183 N.C. 46, 110 S.E. 602, 21 A.L.R. 302. This Latin phrase is translated to mean "To the consenting no injury is done. A person who consents to a thing cannot complain of it as an injury." Upon the plaintiff's testimony she started spending...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases