ROUSE v. SNEAD

No. 201.

157 S.E.2d 124 (1967)

271 N.C. 565

Fred Thomas ROUSE, Jr., Minor, by his Next Friend, Fred Thomas Rouse, Sr., and Fred Thomas Rouse, Sr. v. Fred Hamilton SNEAD, Jr.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 11, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marshall & Williams, by Lonnie B. Williams, Wilmington, for defendant appellant.

Aaron Goldberg, James L. Nelson, Wilmington, for plaintiff appellees.


HIGGINS, Justice.

The defendant has assigned errors based on numerous exceptions to the admission and exclusion of evidence. Examination of each exception fails to reveal error of substance. The evidence was conflicting as to the defendant's speed, as to whether the lights on the plaintiff's vehicle were visible to approaching traffic, and as to the position of the disabled vehicle at the time of collision. The evidence was sufficient to permit the jury to find the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases