LOCAL 248 UAW v. NATZKE


36 Wis.2d 237 (1967)

LOCAL 248 UAW, Respondent, v. NATZKE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 4, 1967.

October 31, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Mount & Keck of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Herbert L. Mount.

For the respondent there was a brief by Zubrensky & Padden, attorneys, and Herbert S. Bratt of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Bratt.

On reargument:

For the appellant there was a supplemental brief and oral argument by John A. Keck and James Urdan, both of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a supplemental brief by Zubrensky, Padden, Graf & Bratt of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Herbert S. Bratt.


CURRIE, C. J.

As a result of the decision of the United States Supreme Court in NLRB v. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co.,6 the appellant employee is now relying upon these three contentions:

(1) That state courts are without jurisdiction to entertain an action, such as the instant one, for collection of a fine imposed upon a union employee who returns to work during a strike, because it would constitute coercion of the employee in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases