TYROLER v. CONT'L CAS. CO.


55 Misc.2d 212 (1967)

Regine H. Tyroler, Appellant, v. Continental Casualty Company, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

November 2, 1967


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Baer, Marks, Friedman & Berliner (Donald Marks of counsel), for appellant. McCormick, Dunne & Foley (John B. Foley of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — STREIT, J. P., GOLD and HOFSTADTER, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The insurance policy being unambiguous, it should be construed according to the plain and ordinary meaning of its terms (Houlihan v. Preferred Acc. Ins. Co., 196 N.Y. 337; McGrail v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc., 292 N.Y. 419; Lachs v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of N. Y. 306 N.Y. 357). The issue was one of law and it was error to submit it to the jury. Defendant by its contract agreed to pay all reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases