1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 36 Wis.2d
  5. 36 Wis.2d 225 (1967)
 

CURRY v. STATE

36 Wis.2d 225 (1967)

CURRY, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

October 3, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there were briefs and oral argument by Manlio G. Parroni of Eau Claire.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general.

HEFFERNAN, J.

The record shows that counsel was appointed for the defendant and that he appeared in court at all critical times during the course of the proceedings. We said in Van Voorhis v. State (1965), 26 Wis.2d 217, 223, 131 N.W.2d 833, that if the record shows that there has been a failure to provide counsel, it becomes the duty of the state to show that the defendant was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases