1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 34 Wis.2d
  5. 34 Wis.2d 218 (1967)
 

LAMBRECHT v. STATE HIGHWAY COMM.

34 Wis.2d 218 (1967)

LAMBRECHT and wife, Appellants, v. STATE HIGHWAY COMMISSION, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 28, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Smith, Puchner, Tinkham & Smith of Wausau, and oral argument by Richard P. Tinkham.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Robert D. Martinson, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Lee A. Bernsteen, district attorney of Oneida county.

BEILFUSS, J.

The issues are: Was it error to admit the opinion evidence as to value based in part upon capitalization of income and, if so, was it prejudicial error?

The defendant, State Highway Commission, moved for a new trial upon the following grounds: (1) Because of errors in trial, and (2) in the interests of justice.

In the affidavit in support of the motion, one of the errors at law alleged by the defendant was "over objection, the expert witnesses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases