1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 66 Cal.2d
  5. 66 Cal.2d 183 (1967)
 

IN RE FORD

Docket No. Crim. 10347.

66 Cal.2d 183 (1967)

424 P.2d 681

57 Cal. Rptr. 129

In re CLAUDELL FORD on Habeas Corpus.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

March 15, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Claudell Ford, in pro. per., and Robert K. Patch, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Edward A. Hinz, Jr., and Arnold O. Overoye, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

We issued an order to show cause on petitioner's prima facie showing that the proscription against double punishment (Pen. Code, § 654) was violated by a burglary sentence imposed to run concurrently with sentences for robbery and kidnaping for robbery pronounced at the same time. The judgment imposing the three sentences was affirmed in People v. Ford, 133 Cal.App.2d 695 [284...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases