1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 246 Or.
  5. 246 Or. 1 (1967)
 

HAMILTON v. CROWN LIFE INS. CO.

246 Or. 1 (1967)

423 P.2d 771

HAMILTON, Appellant, v. CROWN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed February 15, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph D. Balfe, Heppner, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Winter & Balfe, Heppner, and Roy Kilpatrick and Daniel J. Wolke, Canyon City.

George L. Wagner, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were James C. Dezendorf and McColloch, Dezendorf & Spears, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and HOLMAN, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants entered after the trial court ruled that she had not stated a cause of action for an invasion of her right of privacy.

The alleged facts challenged by the demurrer are quoted from the complaint:

"II. "Plaintiff was the beneficiary of a certain life insurance policy sold by defendant, Crown Life Insurance Company to plaintiff's husband; that on or about September...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases