SMART, J., January 24, 1967.
On September 6, 1963, plaintiff filed this complaint against defendant, The Ohio River Company, containing two separate causes of action. The first cause of action is for compensatory damages under the Jones Act and the admiralty doctrine of seaworthiness. The second cause of action was for maintenance and cure under the general admiralty law. However, both causes of action were based upon an incident which is described as follows by plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
