KRUEGER v. WINTERS


37 Wis.2d 204 (1967)

KRUEGER, Appellant, v. WINTERS and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 22, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Schmus & Panosian of West Allis, and by Kersten & Mckinnon of Milwaukee, attorneys, and George P. Kersten of counsel, and oral argument by George P. Kersten.

For the respondents there was a brief by Kivett & Kasdorf, attorneys, and John M. Swietlik of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral arguments by Mr. Swietlik.


BEILFUSS, J.

The issue before this court on appeal is: Should the plaintiff be allowed to disclaim or waive an item of damages in the special verdict thereby expunging the effect of a dissent to that item so as to cure an otherwise defective verdict?

The pertinent statute is sec. 270.25 (1), which provides:

"Verdicts; five-sixths; directed. (1) A verdict agreed to by five-sixths of the jurors shall be the verdict of the jury. If more than...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases