1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 155 Conn.
  5. 155 Conn. 86 (1967)
 

STANLEY WORKS v. NEW BRITAIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

155 Conn. 86 (1967)

THE STANLEY WORKS v. NEW BRITAIN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 10, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur S. Sachs, with whom were Sonja Goldstein and, on the brief, John A. Oliva, for the appellant-appellee (defendant).

Richard G. Bell, with whom were James W. Cooper and William K. Muir, Jr., for the appellee-appellant (plaintiff).

KING, C. J., ALCORN, HOUSE, THIM and RYAN, JS.

THIM, J.

On or about November 25, 1964, the defendant, acting under § 8-129 of the General Statutes, filed with the clerk of the Superior Court at Hartford five statements of compensation as against the plaintiff stating that the premises therein described were found to be located in the South Central Project, a redevelopment area in New Britain, and that the compensation to be paid for the premises was to be $1,000,000. Thereafter, on December 8, 1964, the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases