1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 37 Wis.2d
  5. 37 Wis.2d 195 (1967)
 

KAMROWSKI v. STATE

37 Wis.2d 195 (1967)

KAMROWSKI and wife, Respondents, v. STATE (State Highway Commission), Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 22, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant the cause was argued by Albert Harriman, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general.

For the respondents there was a brief by Hale, Skemp, Hanson, Schnurrer & Skemp of La Crosse, and oral argument by Thomas H. Skemp.

WILKIE, J.

The determinative issue raised on this appeal is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error by excluding evidence as to prices on certain alleged comparable sales offered by the state.

Wisconsin's scenic easement law,1 which is administered through the state's power of eminent domain, was recently declared constitutional by this court in Kamrowski v. State....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases