1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 70 Wn.2d
  5. 70 Wn.2d 153 (1967)
 

KADIAK FISH. CO. v. MURPHY DIESEL CO.

No. 38377.

70 Wn.2d 153 (1967)

422 P.2d 496

KADIAK FISHERIES COMPANY, Respondent, v. MURPHY DIESEL COMPANY, INC., Appellant, ALASKA PACIFIC SUPPLY COMPANY, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

January 5, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Skeel, McKelvy, Henke, Evenson & Uhlmann, by W. Paul Uhlmann and James M. Lindsey, Jr., for appellant.

Bogle, Gates, Dobrin, Wakefield & Long, Ronald E. McKinstry, Peter D. Byrnes, and Dan P. Hungate, for respondent Kadiak Fisheries Company.

Elliott, Lee, Carney & Thomas and James A. Holman, for respondent Alaska Pacific Supply Company.

HAMILTON, J.

In the fall of 1960 respondent Kadiak Fisheries Company (hereafter referred to as Kadiak) decided to repower one of its salmon fishing and cannery tending vessels, the Jaguar, and adapt it to crab fishing. Kadiak's principal officer discussed the project with the president of Alaska Pacific Supply Company (hereafter referred to as Alaska Pacific), the Western Washington "Sales Agent"1 for appellant, Murphy Diesel Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases