ARTMAR, INC. v. UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY CO.


34 Wis.2d 181 (1967)

ARTMAR, INC., and others, Respondents, v. UNITED FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 28, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Moen, Sheehan & Meyer of La Crosse, and oral argument by L. E. Sheehan.

For the respondents there was a brief by Edwards, Hafner & McDonald of La Crosse, and oral argument by Roger W. Hafner.


WILKIE, J.

Two issues are raised on this appeal (1) Can the doctrine of estoppel be used to bring location not included in an insurance contract within the coverage of the policy risk?

(2) Was there a sufficient issue of fact as to the existence of a different agreement than the one contained in the insurance contract so that the motion for summary judgment on the reformation cause of action should be denied?

Estoppel.

The issue in this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases