HOUPLIN v. STOEN

No. 38804.

72 Wn.2d 131 (1967)

431 P.2d 998

JEAN E. HOUPLIN, Appellant, v. GLENN STOEN et al., Respondents.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

September 28, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James R. Young and J. Lael Simmons, for appellant.

Terry V. Bernard and Black, Christensen & Nielsen (Andrew T. Nielsen, of counsel), for respondents Myers.


WEAVER, J.

This is an action to quiet title; it involves a boundary dispute between adjacent landowners. Plaintiff's property is in the south portion of the S.W. 1/4 of section 3, township 27 north, range 6 E.W.M. in Snohomish County. It is adjacent to and north of defendant Myers's property, which is in section 10 in the same township and range.

It is not necessary to burden this opinion with a detailed description of the land.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases