1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 102 Ariz.
  5. 102 Ariz. 100 (1967)
 

RANDALL v. EYMAN

No. H-198-2.

102 Ariz. 100 (1967)

425 P.2d 570

James RANDALL, Petitioner, v. Frank A. EYMAN et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Arizona. In Banc.

March 28, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Randall, in pro. per.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., James S. Tegart, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has filed his petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus setting forth that this court had on November 3, 1966, entered a per curiam order setting aside the judgment and commitment of the Superior Court of Pima County and directing that the custody of petitioner be transferred from the State Prison at Florence, Arizona to the Sheriff of Pima County for re-sentencing, 101 Ariz. 343, 419 P.2d 522

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases