Per Curiam.
Defendant contends that he was denied due process of law by the Court of Appeals, and that the court abused its judicial discretion.
On February 15, 1965, the state filed its notice of appeal, transcript and original papers in the Court of Appeals. Nothing further was done by the state, and on November 4, 1965, in response to defendant's motion to dismiss for want of prosecution and failure to comply with the rules of court, the Court of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
