1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 98 N.J.
  5. 98 N.J. Super. 99 (1967)
 

HUTT v. ROBBINS ET ALS.,

98 N.J. Super. 99 (1967)

236 A.2d 172

STEWART M. HUTT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NORMAN ROBBINS, RALPH P. BARONE AND ISADORE ROSENBLUM, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ADDED DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 1, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Norman Robbins, appellant, argued the cause pro se and for appellant Ralph P. Barone and added defendant Township of Woodbridge.

Mr. Isador Rosenblum, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Mr. Stewart M. Hutt, respondent, argued the cause pro se (Messrs. Hutt & Berkow, attorneys).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KOLOVSKY, J.A.D.

Since January 1, 1964 the form of government of the Township of Woodbridge has been "Mayor-council plan F" under the Optional Municipal Charter Law, N.J.S.A. 40:69A-1 et seq. (hereinafter referred to as the "Faulkner Act").

Among the departments created by the township ordinance known as the Administrative Code of Woodbridge is the Department...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases