HALL, Judge.
In this automobile death case, the trial court did not err in refusing the plaintiff's motion for new trial on the grounds that the verdict was contrary to law, the evidence, and the weight of the evidence, since the evidence supported the verdict for the defendant. The evidence did not demand a finding that the defendant could have seen and avoided hitting the plaintiff's two-year-old child.
Judgment affirmed. Since the judgment complained...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
