NORTON v. CONCORD INSURANCE CO., ET AL.,


97 N.J. Super. 98 (1967)

234 A.2d 493

ROBERT D. NORTON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. THE CONCORD INSURANCE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND MARILYN SCHMUCK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 20, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sam Denstman argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Simon, Jaffe, Denstman & Noonan, attorneys).

Mr. Vincent D. Enright, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Harth & Enright, attorneys).

No appearance on behalf of Marilyn Schmuck.

Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and KOLOVSKY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, S.J.A.D.

Plaintiff Robert D. Norton (Robert) sued to compel defendant Concord Insurance Company (Concord) to defend him against an action for personal injuries brought by his sister Marilyn Schmuck. The trial judge granted summary judgment in Robert's favor and Concord appeals. We affirm.

Robert was driving his father's automobile, with his father's permission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases