OKIMOSH v. STATE


34 Wis.2d 120 (1967)

OKIMOSH, Plaintiff in error, v. STATE, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 28, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief and oral argument by Albert J. Cirilli of Rhinelander.

For the defendant in error the cause was argued by Betty R. Brown, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and William . Platz, assistant attorney general.


WILKIE, J.

Within one year after defendant's conviction defense counsel failed to present a motion to the trial court to have a new trial or to have the verdict set aside because of the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to support that verdict. We have held that failure to make such a motion at the trial court level bars the plaintiff in error from raising the question of the sufficient credible evidence produced at the trial in support of the verdict unless compelling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases