1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 384 F.2d
  5. 384 F.2d 990 (1967)
 

IN RE YALE EXPRESS SYSTEM, INC.

No. 125, Docket 31567.

384 F.2d 990 (1967)

In the Matter of YALE EXPRESS SYSTEM, INC., Debtor. FRUEHAUF CORPORATION, Petitioner-Appellant, v. YALE EXPRESS SYSTEM, INC., Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided November 8, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin F. Hartung, New York City (Conboy, Hewitt, O'Brien & Boardman, Myron D. Cohen, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner-appellant.

William R. Glendon, New York City (Royall, Koegel, Rogers & Wells, David W. Bernstein, New York City, of counsel), for respondent-appellee.

Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, Circuit Judge:

When we reversed the District Judge's prior ruling on Fruehauf Corporation's [Fruehauf] application for reclamation,1 we did so because we believed too much reliance had been placed on In re Lake's Laundry, 79 F.2d 326 (2d Cir. 1933). We expressed the view that the ratio decidendi of that case had been undermined by the adoption in virtually every state of the Uniform...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases