1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 384 F.2d
  5. 384 F.2d 979 (1967)
 

NEW YORK FOR. FRGT. F. & B. ASS'N v. FEDERAL MARITIME COM'N

No. 20868.

384 F.2d 979 (1967)

NEW YORK FOREIGN FREIGHT FORWARDERS AND BROKERS ASSOCIATION, Inc., Petitioner, v. FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents. Associated Latin American Freight Conferences, National Customs Brokers and Forwarders Association of America, Inc., River Plate & Brazil Conferences, North Atlantic Baltic Freight Conference, North Atlantic Continental Freight Conference, North Atlantic French Atlantic Freight Conference, North Atlantic Mediterranean Freight Conference, North Atlantic United Kingdom Freight Conference, Far East Conference, Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided October 10, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Gerald H. Ullman, New York City, for petitioner.

Mr. Joseph F. Kelly, Jr., Atty., Federal Maritime Commission, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. Donald F. Turner, Messrs. James L. Pimper, Gen. Counsel, Robert N. Katz, Sol., Walter H. Mayo III, Atty., Federal Maritime Commission, Irwin A. Seibel and W. Richard Haddad, Attys., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for respondents.

Mr. John R. Mahoney, New York City, for intervenor Associated Latin American Freight Conferences, and others.

Mr. Elkan Turk, Jr., New York City, for intervenor Far East Conference.

Mr. Thomas K. Roche, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Andrew A. Normandeau, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for intervenor National Customs Brokers and Forwarders Ass'n of America, Inc. Mr. Gerald A. Malia, Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for intervenor National Customs Brokers and Forwarders Ass'n of America, Inc.

Before EDGERTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and BURGER and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We are asked to review a final order of the Federal Maritime Commission promulgating certain regulations affecting independent ocean freight forwarders. Petitioner challenges the Commission's authority to promulgate these rules and regulations as well as the reasonableness of the four rules in question. We conclude that the Commission has the requisite authority for the promulgation of these regulations and that Rules 510.23(f), 510.24(a), and 510.24(f...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases