1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 371 F.2d
  5. 371 F.2d 944 (1967)
 

HUTTON COMPANY v. ARROW BUILDERS SUPPLY CORP.

No. 185, Docket 30731.

371 F.2d 944 (1967)

The HUTTON COMPANY, as owner of the SCOW R. ENGELBRECHT, Libellant-Appellee, v. ARROW BUILDERS SUPPLY CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellant, TUG CHIPPEWA II, Nassau Towing Corporation, Claimant-Respondent-Appellee, TUG VALMORAC, Valmorac Tugboat Corp., Claimant-Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided January 30, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Hart, Macklin, Hanan & McKernan, New York City, for libellant-appellee.

Hyman R. Friedman, Maley M. Cohen, E. Edan Spencer, New York City, for respondent-appellant.

John R. Hanrahan, Jr., Foley & Martin, New York City, for Tug Chippewa II and Nassau Towing Corp.

Before WATERMAN, MOORE and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal in the admiralty from an interlocutory decree of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Following a collision between a barge and a scow on the Harlem River the libellant, Hutton Company (Hutton), owner of the scow, sued Arrow Builders Supply Corporation (Arrow) and the tugs Chippewa II and Valmorac and their owners. Arrow cross-claimed against the tugs, and, in the event the tugs were found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases