GUZY v. GANDEL


95 N.J. Super. 34 (1967)

229 A.2d 809

EUNICE N. GUZY AND STEPHEN GUZY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. HERBERT GANDEL, FLORENCE GANDEL AND CARL GANDEL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 4, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas F. Shebell, Jr. argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Thomas F. Shebell, attorney).

Mr. Samuel A. DeGonge argued the cause for respondents (Mr. Robert F. Colquhoun, attorney).

Before Judges LEWIS, LABRECQUE and CONFORD.


PER CURIAM.

In an unreported decision (Dkt. A-924-64) we reversed a judgment of dismissal based upon the alleged inadequacy of plaintiffs' opening statement and remanded this case for trial upon the merits. Plaintiffs' present appeal is from judgments in favor of the infant defendant Carl Gandel and his parents, Herbert Gandel and Florence Gandel. We affirm.

On June 3, 1961 plaintiff Eunice N. Guzy, then...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases