1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 276 F.Supp.
  5. 276 F.Supp. 1008 (1967)
 

VOGEL v. TENNECO OIL COMPANY

Civ. A. No. 1696-67.

276 F.Supp. 1008 (1967)

Sam VOGEL and Snyder & Hilda Vogel, Plaintiffs, v. TENNECO OIL COMPANY (a corporation), Defendant.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

December 1, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl L. Shipley, Rufus W. Peckham, Shipley, Ackerman & Pickett, Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Max H. Lawrence, Oklahoma City, Okl., Robert E. Shaw, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

OPINION

SIRICA, District Judge.

The parties are before the court on a motion to dismiss a complaint for breach of contract on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter. Defendant has also moved for a change of venue in the event the court finds that jurisdiction is present. Plaintiffs are citizens and residents of Texas. Defendant is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Texas,1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases