1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 102 Ariz.
  5. 102 Ariz. 25 (1967)
 

STINES v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. 8947.

102 Ariz. 25 (1967)

424 P.2d 153

Charles G. STINES, Individually, as Guardian Ad Litem of Terry J. Stines, a minor, and as the Surviving Spouse of Margaret M. Stines, deceased, Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, and Judge Warren L. McCarthy, and Sparkle Chemical and Cleantenance Company, Paul Matak and Ann Matak, his wife, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Arizona. In Banc.

February 28, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Langerman, Begam & Lewis, Phoenix, for petitioners.

Snell & Wilmer, Phoenix, for respondents Sparkle Chemical and Cleantenance Co.

Herbert Mallamo, Phoenix, for respondents Matak.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is ordered denied. The asserted impeaching evidence having been deposited with the clerk of the court in compliance with Rule XVI(c) (1) (vii), Uniform Rules of Practice, as amended February 1st, 1967, 17 A.R.S., the trial judge should examine such evidence for the purpose of determining whether it is for impeachment purposes, in accordance with our decision in Zimmerman v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa County,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases