1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 374 F.2d
  5. 374 F.2d 889 (1967)
 

UNITED STATES v. HAILEY

No. 11001.

374 F.2d 889 (1967)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. James Pearl HAILEY, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.

Decided March 9, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Parks Helms, Charlotte, N. C. (Court-appointed counsel), for appellant.

Wm. Medford, U. S. Atty., for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, WINTER, Circuit Judge, and HARVEY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In this Dyer Act case, court assigned counsel earnestly attacks the Court's charge as misleading.1 There was no objection to the charge at the time of the trial, for the trial lawyers saw no prejudice in it.2

If the charge might be said to have been exceptionable in any respect, there was no plain error affecting substantial rights within the meaning of Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases