1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 373 F.2d
  5. 373 F.2d 851 (1967)
 

UNEEDA DOLL CO. v. GOLDFARB NOVELTY CO.

No. 396, Docket 31165.

373 F.2d 851 (1967)

UNEEDA DOLL CO., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOLDFARB NOVELTY CO., Inc. and Walgreen Eastern Co., Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided March 9, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard Zissu, New York City (Zissu, Marcus & Stein, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas R. Farrell, New York City (Martin Kleinbard, and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee Goldfarb Novelty.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

J. JOSEPH SMITH, Circuit Judge:

The Uneeda Doll Company, Inc. appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a) (1) from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, John F. Dooling, Judge, which denied its motion to enjoin preliminarily the Goldfarb Novelty Company, Inc. and the Walgreen Eastern Company from infringing the copyright on appellant's "Pee Wee" doll. Judge Dooling found that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases