The State contends that the parcels in question were within the boundaries of the existing highway and that the widening of the road did not result in the taking of any lands of the claimants. The record shows that the title to claimants' lands extended to the center of the highway and that the highway in front of claimants' lands had been maintained at a width of three rods. The State attempts to establish a four-rod width claiming that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.