UNITED STATES v. GOLDSMITH


272 F.Supp. 924 (1967)

Application of the UNITED STATES of America and Oscar Mintzer, Petitioners, v. Frieda GOLDSMITH, Respondent.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

June 13, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph P. Hoey, U. S. Atty., Eastern Dist. of New York, for petitioners, Daniel A. Rago, Asst. U. S. Atty., of counsel.

Davis & Davis, New York City, for respondent, Harold Davis, New York City, of counsel.


ROSLING, District Judge.

The circumstantial context in which the motion is made, the relief sought, the objections interposed and the threshold problems are sufficiently set out in the interim memorandums filed by the Court on March 29 and April 17, 1967, so that no repetition except, possibly, tangential reference required to maintain continuity of discussion will here be made.

A principle of general application accords the privilege against self-incrimination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases