Claimant, while working, was struck in the right eye by a piece of metal which necessitated the surgical removal of the lens of that eye. The sole issue raised by claimant-appellant is that he is entitled to an award for the total loss of use of the right eye. The board twice referred this case for further medical testimony, the last time to an impartial ophthalmologist. On the entire record the board found that claimant could not tolerate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
