The effect of the judgment, of course, would be to require the bank to pay twice for the value of the cows taken by it as the result of mistaken identification and plaintiff in its reply pleaded res judicata in defense. The 53 cows with which the prior action was concerned were part of the total of 59 actually seized, the trial court in that action finding that the remaining 6 were properly identified...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
