1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 275 F.Supp.
  5. 275 F.Supp. 903 (1967)
 

AMPHENOL CORPORATION v. GENERAL TIME CORPORATION

No. 66 C 218.

275 F.Supp. 903 (1967)

AMPHENOL CORPORATION, a corporation of Delaware, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL TIME CORPORATION, a corporation of Delaware, Defendant.

United States District Court N. D. Illinois, E. D.

July 31, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Erwin C. Heininger, Burton Glazov, Mayer, Friedlich, Spiess, Tierney, Brown & Platt, Scott W. Lucas, of Lucas & Thomas, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Phillip H. Mayer, John P. Bundock, Jr., Wolfe, Hubbard, Voit & Osann, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILL, District Judge.

Plaintiff brought this action under 35 U.S.C. § 281, seeking money damages and injunctive relief against defendant's alleged infringement of plaintiff's United States Patent No. 3,137,122. This court has jurisdiction over the action under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). From the evidence presented at a bench trial of the instant action, we conclude that the patent in suit was invalid and therefore not infringed.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases