Under the unusual facts at bar we conclude that the 1962 "award" herein was actually a new and substituted agreement adopted in the form of an award by the parties in place of their November, 1956 stockholders' agreement and for the purpose of providing a plan for the redemption of appellants' stock. The fact that the 1962 "award" was not confirmed within the statutory period did not diminish its character as a continuing agreement which, among other things, provided for...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.