BALTIMORE SHIP. & RECEIV. ASS'N v. PUBLIC UTIL. COM'N OF CAL.

Civ. Nos. 45076, 45123 and 45576.

268 F.Supp. 836 (1967)

BALTIMORE SHIPPERS AND RECEIVERS ASSOCIATION, Inc., the Charter Oak Shippers Cooperative Association, Inc., Industrial Shippers Association, Inc., United Shippers Association, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA and Peter E. Mitchell, William M. Bennett, A. W. Gatov, William Symons, Jr., and Fred P. Morrissey, Defendants. CHARLES J. WORTH DRAYAGE COMPANY, Los Angeles Wholesale Institute, Plaintiffs, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA and Peter E. Mitchell, William M. Bennett, A. W. Gatov, William Symons, Jr., and Fred P. Morrissey, Defendants. G. I. TRUCKING COMPANY, Redway Truck and Warehouse Company, Plaintiffs, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA and Peter E. Mitchell, William M. Bennett, A. W. Gatov, William Symons, Jr., and Fred P. Morrissey, Defendants.

United States District Court N. D. California.

May 23, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald N. Cobert, Grove, Jaskiewicz & Gilliam, Washington, D. C., Howard M. Downs, Howard, Prim, Smith, Rice & Downs, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs Baltimore Shippers and Receivers Association, Inc., The Charter Oak Shippers Cooperative Association, Inc., Industrial Shippers Association, Inc., and United Shippers Association, Inc.

Cecil E. Ricks, Jr., Hill, Farrer & Burrill, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs Charles J. Worth Drayage Co. and Los Angeles Wholesale Institute.

Donald Murchison, Murchison & Stebbins, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiffs G. I. Trucking Co. and Redway Truck and Warehouse Co.

Mary Moran Pajalich, Bernard A. Peeters, Janice E. Kerr, Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, San Francisco, Cal., for defendants.

Before HAMLIN, Circuit Judge, and BURKE and ZIRPOLI, District Judges.


ORDER GRANTING PERMANENT INJUNCTION

ZIRPOLI, District Judge.

This is an action brought by two classes of plaintiffs, (1) nonprofit cooperative shippers' associations, and (2) motor carriers who contract with such shippers' associations to deliver their goods from break-bulk points to final destinations, both within the State of California. The action is brought to contest the jurisdiction of defendants to require the carriers

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases