1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 55 Misc.2d
  5. 55 Misc.2d 1041 (1967)
 

MTR. OF CUMBERBATCH v. LYTLE

55 Misc.2d 1041 (1967)

In the Matter of Floyd F. Cumberbatch, Petitioner, v. William G. Lytle et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Erie County.

December 11, 1967

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Gardner for petitioner. Herald P. Fahringer, Jr., for William G. Lytle, respondent. Henry Spitz and Sidney Kant for State Commission for Human Rights, respondent.

CARLTON A. FISHER, J.

On or about the 30th day of August, 1965, the petitioner, a Negro, filed a verified complaint with respondent commission, in which he charged the respondents Lytle, a real estate broker, and Galvin, a salesman, with violation of section 296 (subd. 5, par. [c], subpar. [1]) of the Law Against Discrimination, which is article 15 of the Executive Law. After filing the complaint it was subsequently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases