HALL v. TEAL

No. 7959.

427 P.2d 662 (1967)

77 N.M. 780

Clyde HALL and Arthur Ortiz & Son, a corpartnership Consisting of Arthur Ortiz, Sr. and Arthur Ortiz, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Paul TEAL and Lorene Teal, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of New Mexico.

May 15, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin M. Sherman, Deming, for appellees.


OPINION

HENSLEY, JR., Chief Judge, Court of Appeals.

The plaintiff, Clyde Hall, sought to recover a money judgment from the defendants, Paul Teal and Lorene Teal. The plaintiffs, Arthur Ortiz, Sr. and Arthur Ortiz, Jr., as creditors of Clyde Hall, were joined as co-plaintiffs in the second amended complaint by reason of an assignment executed by Hall of all proceeds of any monies recovered from the defendants.

The controversy stems from the lease...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases