Per Curiam.
A prior judgment in the same amount was reversed because neither party produced evidence of market value and, although the property was neither unique nor a specialty, the State relied solely on proof of land value plus reproduction cost of the improvements and claimants produced evidence on the same basis and, additionally, employed a method which their expert termed a "capitalization approach of gross annual earnings". (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
