WHITNEY v. BOHACK FOOD STORES


53 Misc.2d 1022 (1967)

Annabelle Whitney, Respondent, v. Bohack Food Stores, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

May 24, 1967


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin, Montfort, Healy, McGuire & Salley (E. Richard Rimmels, Jr., of counsel), for appellant. Shepps, Saltzman & Haber (William B. Saltzman of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — MARTUSCELLO, GROAT and COYLE, JJ.


Per Curiam.

In view of plaintiff's failure to present any excuse for the lack of prosecution and an affidavit of merits, her motion should have been denied (CPLR, 5015, subd. [a], par. 1; Keating v. Smith, 20 A.D.2d 141). Rule 14 of the Nassau County District Court Rules, authorizing the dismissal of an action which remains on the general calendar for more than a year without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases