1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 248 Cal.App.2d
  5. 248 Cal.App.2d 812 (1967)
 

FLORES v. PACIFIC ISLAND TRANSPORT LINES

Docket No. 30728.

248 Cal.App.2d 812 (1967)

57 Cal. Rptr. 73

ARTHUR FLORES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PACIFIC ISLAND TRANSPORT LINES, Defendant and Appellant; THOR-DAHL A/S, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant; CRESCENT WHARF & WAREHOUSE COMPANY, Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

February 27, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lillick, Geary, McHose & Roethke, Lillick, McHose, Wheat, Adams & Charles and Lawrence D. Bradley, Jr., for Defendant and Appellant and for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Magana, Olney, Levy & Cathcart, Mitchell Levy, Ellis J. Horvitz and Morton Minikes for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Sikes, Pinney & Matthew and John Scott Matthew for Cross-defendant and Respondent.

FOURT, J.

This action was instituted by longshoreman Arthur Flores (hereinafter called Flores) against ship's owner Thor-Dahl A/S (hereinafter called Thor-Dahl) for damages for personal injuries suffered when, in the course of his employment by Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Company (hereinafter called Crescent), Flores was engaged in unloading the vessel Thorsisle. Thor-Dahl filed a cross-complaint for indemnity against Crescent and the jury returned a verdict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases