CRUMMER v. ZALK

Docket No. 22225.

248 Cal.App.2d 794 (1967)

57 Cal. Rptr. 185

R.E. CRUMMER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ALLAN F. ZALK et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

February 27, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Dan Lange, Wadsworth, Fraser & McClung and Edgar T. Fraser for Defendants and Appellants.

Osburn & Osburn and Marvin Osburn for Plaintiff and Respondent.


DRAPER, P.J.

After 52 days of trial to the court without a jury, plaintiff had judgment against defendants Zalk and Beeler. Both defendants appeal. The appeal is upon the clerk's transcript alone, although that transcript contains exhibits introduced at trial. Our statement of facts summarizes the findings.

In 1957, plaintiff exchanged his Oakland office building for defendant Beeler's ranch near the San Mateo County coast. As part of this exchange agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases