1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 371 F.2d
  5. 371 F.2d 661 (1967)
 

COWEN v. NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE

No. 248, Docket 30814.

371 F.2d 661 (1967)

Max L. COWEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE and Mohawk Valley Investing Company, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided January 24, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel S. Cohen, Utica, N. Y., for appellant.

William E. Jackson, New York City (Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City, Attorneys; Samuel L. Rosenberry, Isaac Shapiro and Patrick Owen Burns, New York City, and Evans, Pirnie & Burdick and Hugh R. Jones, Utica, N. Y., of counsel), for appellee New York Stock Exchange.

John M. Liddy, Utica, N. Y. (Ferris, Hughes, Dorrance & Groben, Utica, N. Y., on the brief), for appellee Mohawk Valley Investing Co.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and HAYS and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

HAYS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, Max L. Cowen, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York dismissing his amended complaint, which seeks treble damages under the Sherman and Clayton Acts, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 15,1 and granting summary judgment to the defendants. We find no error and affirm the order of dismissal.

Plaintiff was employed by defendant Mohawk Valley Investing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases