SPATARO v. SOUTHERN PAC. CO.

Docket No. 23097.

254 Cal.App.2d 778 (1967)

62 Cal. Rptr. 621

SALVATORE J. SPATARO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents. EARL WEEKS, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants. (Consolidated Actions.)

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

September 29, 1967.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George F. Jansen for Plaintiffs and Appellants and for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Ricksen, Ricksen, Snook & Vendt, Sayer Snook and Richard G. Logan for Defendants and Respondents and for Defendants and Appellants.


DRAPER, P.J.

This appeal presents a factual oddity in motor vehicle-train collision cases — an implied finding that the truck driver's recovery is not barred by contributory negligence, but that his fellow employee, who rode on the right side of the vehicle and did not touch its controls, was contributorily negligent.

Plaintiff Weeks was the driver, and plaintiff Spataro the relief driver, of a tractor-trailer combination owned by plaintiff Sudo. A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases