Appellant's sole contention is that the sentence to an indeterminate term constituted reversible error and that for the misdemeanor of which he was convicted the court was required to sentence him to serve a definite, fixed term of imprisonment. In our opinion, the comments of the sentencing Justice cannot be construed as a finding of incorrigibility (see, People v. Watson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. VARGAS
28 A.D.2d 999 (1967)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Julio Antonio Vargas, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 16, 1967
October 16, 1967
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.