There was substantial evidence to warrant the Administrator's finding that petitioner did not seek in good faith to recover possession of the housing accommodations for occupancy by himself and his family. The court may not substitute its judgment for that of the Administrator (Matter of Eastman v. Berman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF RAMOS v. BERMAN
28 A.D.2d 998 (1967)
In the Matter of Santana Ramos, Respondent, v. Frederic S. Berman, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 16, 1967
October 16, 1967
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.