1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 35 Wis.2d
  5. 35 Wis.2d 66 (1967)
 

MILWAUKEE v. BICHEL

35 Wis.2d 66 (1967)

CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Respondent, v. BICHEL, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 9, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Edwin C. Rachow of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by John J. Fleming, city attorney, and Theophilus C. Crockett, assistant city attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Crockett.

HEFFERNAN, J.

A verdict ought to be directed if, taking into consideration all the facts and circumstances as they appear in evidence, there is but one inference or conclusion that can be reached by a reasonable man. 1 Wisconsin Continuing Legal Education 125. In this case the trial judge concluded that the facts before him warranted the directed verdict of "guilty." He made no analysis of the evidence in a memorandum opinion, so we do not have the benefit of his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases