1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.2d
  4. 66 Cal.2d
  5. 66 Cal.2d 34 (1967)
 

RUSSIAN HILL IMPROVEMENT ASSN. v. BOARD OF PERMIT APP.

Docket No. S.F. 21914.

66 Cal.2d 34 (1967)

423 P.2d 824

56 Cal. Rptr. 672

RUSSIAN HILL IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. BOARD OF PERMIT APPEALS OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

February 24, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, Robert A. Kenealey, Deputy City Attorney, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, John B. Bates, Noble K. Gregory and Thomas E. Feeney for Defendants and Appellants.

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Caspar W. Weinberger and M. Laurence Popofsky for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

TOBRINER, J.

The present controversy involves an attempt by the Board of Permit Appeals to authorize the construction of a building which would rise to over twice the maximum height permitted by the governing ordinances of the City and County of San Francisco.

The trial court granted a writ of mandate directing the board to revoke a permit purporting to authorize such construction. Defendants appeal, contending that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases