1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 265 F.Supp.
  5. 265 F.Supp. 741 (1967)
 

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES

C.D. 2912, Protest No. 64/21199-94890.

265 F.Supp. 741 (1967)

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES.

United States Customs Court, Second Division.

March 7, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, New York City (James F. Donnelly and Richard C. Meade, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Barefoot Sanders, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Harvey A. Isaacs and Avram Weisberger, New York City, trial attorneys), for defendant.

Before RAO and FORD, Judges.

FORD, Judge:

The subject merchandise, known as a Sendzimir planetary rolling mill, was classified as a machine tool and parts thereof under the provisions of paragraph 372, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802. Plaintiff contends the importation is properly classifiable under provisions of the same paragraph, as modified by T.D. 55615 and T.D. 55649 as a machine, not specially provided for.

The pertinent provisions of paragraph 372, as so modified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases